tukey–kramer multiple comparison test Search Results


anova and after tukey kramer multiple comparison test using graphpad prism software  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc anova and after tukey kramer multiple comparison test using graphpad prism software
Anova And After Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparison Test Using Graphpad Prism Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm37768213__am3c10562_si_001-91-13-24?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova and after tukey kramer multiple comparison test using graphpad prism software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey–kramer multiple comparison test graphpad instat version 3.05  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc tukey–kramer multiple comparison test graphpad instat version 3.05
Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparison Test Graphpad Instat Version 3.05, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm19914226-115-9-13?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey–kramer multiple comparison test graphpad instat version 3.05 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey-kramer’s post-hoc test  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute tukey-kramer’s post-hoc test
Tukey Kramer’s Post Hoc Test, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pmc08195389-109-2-38?v=SAS+institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey-kramer’s post-hoc test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
repeated measure anova followed by tukey kramer test for multiple comparison  (ncss llc)
90
ncss llc repeated measure anova followed by tukey kramer test for multiple comparison
Repeated Measure Anova Followed By Tukey Kramer Test For Multiple Comparison, supplied by ncss llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pmc04383136-90-10-22?v=ncss+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
repeated measure anova followed by tukey kramer test for multiple comparison - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukey-kramer multiple-comparisons test  (ncss llc)
90
ncss llc tukey-kramer multiple-comparisons test
Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by ncss llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm29609172-108-1-17?v=ncss+llc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukey-kramer multiple-comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ed and maximum values software v3.00  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc ed and maximum values software v3.00
Ed And Maximum Values Software V3.00, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm12062711-90-0-6?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ed and maximum values software v3.00 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Anova And Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparison Tests, Kruskal Wallis And Dunn’s Post Test, Log Rank Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pmc07429183-152-13-27?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sliced-effect multiple comparison approach with a tukey–kramer adjustment version 9.2  (SAS institute)
90
SAS institute sliced-effect multiple comparison approach with a tukey–kramer adjustment version 9.2
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Sliced Effect Multiple Comparison Approach With A Tukey–Kramer Adjustment Version 9.2, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pmc07112639-73-22-26?v=SAS+institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sliced-effect multiple comparison approach with a tukey–kramer adjustment version 9.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
two-tailed student’s t-test and one way anova with tukey-kramer multiple comparison test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc two-tailed student’s t-test and one way anova with tukey-kramer multiple comparison test
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Two Tailed Student’s T Test And One Way Anova With Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pmc03866024-168-2-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
two-tailed student’s t-test and one way anova with tukey-kramer multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
anova comparing multiple groups or followed by the parametric tukey-kramer test for two comparison  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc anova comparing multiple groups or followed by the parametric tukey-kramer test for two comparison
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Anova Comparing Multiple Groups Or Followed By The Parametric Tukey Kramer Test For Two Comparison, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm18292527-93-14-29?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova comparing multiple groups or followed by the parametric tukey-kramer test for two comparison - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tukeykramer multiple comparison test  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc tukeykramer multiple comparison test
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Tukeykramer Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm21079376-120-7-18?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tukeykramer multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
repeated measures anova with tukey–kramer multiple comparisons test instat 3.05  (GraphPad Software Inc)
90
GraphPad Software Inc repeated measures anova with tukey–kramer multiple comparisons test instat 3.05
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Repeated Measures Anova With Tukey–Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test Instat 3.05, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tukey%E2%80%93kramer+multiple+comparison+test/pm18062779-183-7-16?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
repeated measures anova with tukey–kramer multiple comparisons test instat 3.05 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < 0.001). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < 0.001). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Proliferation: Ki67 + cells/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01); ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05; ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406, representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification. Apoptosis: TUNEL + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05): ( F ) M-406 N. S; Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test; ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Proliferation: Ki67 + cells/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01); ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05; ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406, representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification. Apoptosis: TUNEL + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05): ( F ) M-406 N. S; Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test; ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, TUNEL Assay, Comparison

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) representative tumor sections from M-234p and M-406, 400×. In both models the behavior was similar. Control group: ( A ) M-234p and ( C ) M-406: capillaries with small endothelial cells with barely stained nuclei and intercellular gaps (yellow arrow), lack of pericytes or cells with structure and staining compatible with pericytes. Cy+Los group: ( B ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406: intra- and peritumoral capillaries with structure and morphology similar to normal tissues. Endothelial cells with defined nuclei provide a continuous uninterrupted lining (yellow arrow), and well defined basal membrane covered with pericytes (red arrow). M-406 magnified section (1000×): vessel with normal vascular morphology. HIF1α expression: HIF1α + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), ( F ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05), ( G ) and H ), representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) representative tumor sections from M-234p and M-406, 400×. In both models the behavior was similar. Control group: ( A ) M-234p and ( C ) M-406: capillaries with small endothelial cells with barely stained nuclei and intercellular gaps (yellow arrow), lack of pericytes or cells with structure and staining compatible with pericytes. Cy+Los group: ( B ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406: intra- and peritumoral capillaries with structure and morphology similar to normal tissues. Endothelial cells with defined nuclei provide a continuous uninterrupted lining (yellow arrow), and well defined basal membrane covered with pericytes (red arrow). M-406 magnified section (1000×): vessel with normal vascular morphology. HIF1α expression: HIF1α + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), ( F ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05), ( G ) and H ), representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Staining, Membrane, Expressing, Comparison

M-234p: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, N. S. ( D ) Th17 cells, N. S. M-406: ( E ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( F ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( G ) Treg cells, ( P = 0.064). ( H ) Th17 cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P = 0.0580). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: M-234p: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, N. S. ( D ) Th17 cells, N. S. M-406: ( E ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( F ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( G ) Treg cells, ( P = 0.064). ( H ) Th17 cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P = 0.0580). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Lymphocytes/field (median, range). M-234p: ( A ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( C ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Los, P < 0.05, vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( D – F ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification; M-406: ( G ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( H ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( I ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( J – L ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lymphocytes/field (median, range). M-234p: ( A ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( C ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Los, P < 0.05, vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( D – F ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification; M-406: ( G ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( H ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( I ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( J – L ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Quantification of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by flow cytometry: M-234p, day 42, Cy vs Cy+Los: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, ( P < 0.001). ( D ) Th17 cells, ( P < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post -test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by flow cytometry: M-234p, day 42, Cy vs Cy+Los: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, ( P < 0.001). ( D ) Th17 cells, ( P < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post -test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Comparison

αSMA : % of αSMA + area/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Los, ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.01). ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy, ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001). ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Collagen : % of collagen area/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01). ( F ) M-406 N. S. ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: αSMA : % of αSMA + area/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Los, ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.01). ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy, ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001). ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Collagen : % of collagen area/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01). ( F ) M-406 N. S. ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison